Rehearse recovery. Recover clean. — on-demand isolated environments where rebuilds happen away from the attacker and drills happen on calendar.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
Commvault Cleanroom Recovery is the category creator of isolated recovery: on-demand cloud environments — spun up in Azure when needed, torn down after — where you rehearse recovery plans on schedule and rebuild systems after an attack without restoring into the network the attacker still owns. Recovery points are scanned clean (Threat Scan) on the way in, forensics can proceed in parallel, and the environment doubles as the recovery-testing capability auditors, insurers and boards now explicitly ask about. The classic failure it prevents has a name — reinfection — and it's why paying ransoms often doesn't end incidents.
This page covers Cleanroom Recovery. The rest of the eight-product portfolio:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
An isolated recovery environment — spun up on demand, disconnected from the compromised estate — where systems are rebuilt from scanned-clean backups, validated, and only then returned.
Between incidents, the same rooms host rehearsals: recovery drills against real backups, on calendar, without production risk.
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Restore into production + hope | Isolated rebuild (Cleanroom) |
|---|---|---|
| Post-attack restore | Into the network the attacker still owns | Into an isolated room — by construction |
| The recovery point | 'Probably clean' — a guess | Threat-scanned at the gate |
| Forensics vs business | Fighting over the same machines | Crime scene preserved; rebuild parallel |
| DR testing | Risky, weekend-eating, so skipped | Quarterly drills on calendar |
| The RTO | An aspiration in a slide | A measured observation with a date |
| The DR site | A standing bill or nothing | On-demand rooms, priced by use |
| Identity first | 'We'll figure out AD somehow' | Forest recovery inside the room |
| Insurer's question | 'We have a plan document' | Drill reports, attached |
Adoption starts with one drill — and the first rehearsal’s findings list is the business case writing itself.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Isolated cloud environments provisioned when needed and torn down after — cleanroom capability without a standing DR-site invoice.
Recovery points are scanned for malware before they enter — the room stays clean because nothing dirty gets in.
System recovery order, dependencies and validation orchestrated — including AD forest recovery inside the room.
Recovery drills on calendar against real backups — the plan stays true because it keeps being executed.
Rehearsal outcomes, timings and validation results exported — the artifact boards, auditors and insurers now request by name.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Cleanroom Recovery replaces the reinfection gamble — and the never-executed plan — with a motion you’ve rehearsed until boring.
The cleanroom exists when you need it and vanishes when you don't — capability priced by use, not by standing idle.
No route back to the compromised estate — the rebuild happens where the attacker, by construction, isn't.
Threat Scan checks recovery points on the way in — restoring the infection alongside the data is the classic failure; the gate exists to kill it.
Anomaly signals and scan results guide which recovery point predates the compromise — the 'when were we last clean?' question, answered with data.
Recovery order, dependencies and validation as runbooks — the rebuild follows a script, not adrenaline.
AD forest recovery runs inside the cleanroom — authentication rebuilt first, in isolation, the way real recoveries must sequence.
Systems boot, services answer, apps validate inside the room before anything returns — 'recovered' means verified, not hoped.
The compromised estate stays preserved as a crime scene while business rebuilds in the room — IR and recovery stop fighting over the same machines.
Quarterly rehearsals against real backups without production risk — the difference between a plan and a rumour, on calendar.
Rehearsals produce real recovery timings — the RTO in your board deck becomes an observation, not an aspiration.
Drill outcomes exported as evidence — the 'show us a tested recovery' question from insurers and auditors, pre-answered.
Air Gap Protect's immutable copies feed the room — the full motion: untouchable copy, scanned entry, isolated rebuild, validated return.
Official demos — the step-by-step, the post-attack scenario and the five-minute idea.
The full motion walked through — provision, scan, rebuild, validate.
The post-attack scenario — rebuilding while the estate stays a crime scene.
The category-defining idea in five minutes.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →Here’s what genuinely sets Cleanroom Recovery apart from the alternatives.
The classic post-attack mistake is restoring into the network the attacker still owns — incidents that 'end' and then restart. Isolation by construction is the only real fix, and this productised it first.
DR tests used to risk production and consume weekends, so they didn't happen. On-demand rooms make quarterly drills a calendar event — and an unrehearsed plan is a rumour.
The old answer — a permanent isolated recovery environment — priced this capability out of everyone but the Fortune 100. Ephemeral Azure rooms price it by use.
IR wants the estate preserved; the business wants it rebuilt. The room lets both happen at once — the incident-response argument nobody needed, resolved by architecture.
'When did we last test recovery, and how long did it take?' now arrives from boards, auditors and insurers alike. Drill reports with measured RTOs are the only good answer.
Immutable copy (Air Gap Protect) → scanned entry (Threat Scan) → identity first (AD forest recovery) → validated rebuild. One vendor, one rehearsed motion — not four products duct-taped in an incident.
The current plan's honesty tested on paper: recovery order, identity dependency, clean-point selection, evidence. TechBag runs it free.
A scoped rehearsal — crown-jewel systems plus AD — recovered into an ephemeral room, timed and reported.
Findings folded back (there are always findings); recovery order corrected; the drill repeats until boring.
Drills on calendar, evidence on file, insurer and audit questions pre-answered. TechBag manages the consumption commercials.
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“We got hit on a Thursday. Forensics kept the estate; the business rebuilt in the room; customer systems answered by Monday. The two never fought over a single machine.”
“Our first rehearsal produced a measured RTO of 22 hours against a board assumption of 'about a day or two'. Now the board deck has a number with a date on it.”
“Threat Scan caught the implant in what we'd assumed was a clean recovery point — three days before we'd have restored it into production. That catch was the year's budget justified.”
“The insurer's questionnaire asked for recovery-test evidence. We attached two drill reports. The premium conversation changed tone visibly.”
“Quarterly drills went from a weekend-consuming production risk to a Tuesday. Attendance at DR tests is now… voluntary and high, which is new.”
“AD forest recovery inside the room was the unlock — authentication first, in isolation, exactly like the real day would demand.”
“Budget note: room-hours are consumption — drills cost real money. Still a rounding error next to a standing DR site, but model it.”
“The rehearsal found that two 'critical' systems had circular dependencies nobody documented. Finding that on a calm Tuesday is the product.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the cyber recovery market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
The category creator — on-demand, scanned, rehearsed, evidenced. This page's subject.
The grid nobody publishes — how complete the copy→scan→rebuild→evidence motion is vs what it costs to keep.
Full motion (copy→scan→rebuild→evidence) at on-demand economics.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
The platform rivals, the vault heritage and the DIY mirage — honest lanes, hubs landing this wave.
| Dimension | Commvault Cleanroom | Rubrik Cyber Recovery | Veeam (clean-room patterns) | Dell Cyber Vault | DIY isolated env |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | Productised isolated recovery | Cyber-recovery suite | Patterns + partners | Hardware vault + services | Your engineers' project |
| Standing cost | On-demand | Platform-priced | Your infrastructure | Standing vault | Standing or fragile |
| Clean-entry scanning | Threat Scan gated | Native scanning | Malware scan available | Analytics in vault | Your problem |
| Rehearsal ergonomics | Scheduled drills, evidenced | Supported | Orchestrator-driven | Service-flavoured | Manual heroics |
| Identity recovery inside | AD forest in the room | Supported | Via runbooks | Service-designed | The hardest part |
| Platform integration | One motion with the estate | Native to Rubrik | Native to Veeam | Adjacent stack | Glue everywhere |
| Best fit | Commvault estates & regulated firms | Rubrik-platform buyers | Veeam shops with RO | Air-gapped-vault mandates | Teams with idle engineers |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Drag the sliders (count critical systems; IT-hour cost as loaded ops rate). Estimates assume ~6 hours per critical system per year across ad-hoc DR-test theatre, dependency archaeology and evidence assembly, with ~65% absorbed by scheduled drills and exports — the real number is downtime days avoided, and your revenue-per-hour prices that one. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Cleanroom prices on consumption — rooms cost when they exist. TechBag models the drill cadence in one GST quote.
Best for proving the motion
Best for evidence programmes
Best for attack readiness
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Ask your current plan: where exactly do we restore to after an attack? If the answer is 'production', that's the finding.
PoC success = one full rehearsal with a stopwatch — the measured RTO is the deliverable.
Does the drill include AD forest recovery inside the room? Authentication is step one of every real recovery.
Have Threat Scan evaluate your 'known good' recovery points. The results surprise most estates.
Let the rehearsal expose undocumented system dependencies — it will.
Export the drill report and hand it to whoever asks about recovery (board, auditor, insurer). Does it answer them as-is?
Price the quarterly-drill cadence honestly — room-hours cost money; standing sites cost more.
Rehearse the exit too: how do validated systems return to (rebuilt) production?
Scope a PoC whose deliverable is a timed rehearsal, or bring your recovery plan and let a TechBag advisor ask it the reinfection question.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.