Rebuild the app, not just the data — infrastructure, config, dependencies and state, time-machined and recreated on demand across AWS, Azure and GCP.
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
Commvault Cloud Rewind (from the 2024 Appranix acquisition) rebuilds entire cloud applications — not just their data: infrastructure, networking, configuration, dependencies AND state, discovered continuously and reassembled on demand in AWS, Azure or GCP. Traditional backup restores your database and leaves you rebuilding VPCs, load balancers, IAM and DNS from tribal memory; Cloud Rewind time-machines the whole application environment, turning region failures, account compromises and destructive misconfigurations into orchestrated rebuilds measured in hours. Data without its environment is half a recovery — this is the other half.
This page covers Cloud Rewind. The rest of the eight-product portfolio:
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
Recovery for the whole application, not just its data: the VPCs, IAM, load balancers, DNS, dependencies and configuration that make restored data mean something — discovered continuously, versioned like a time machine, recreated on demand.
Cloud Rewind (né Appranix) defined the category; the 2024 acquisition put it on the Commvault platform.
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Backup + tribal-memory rebuild | App-complete rebuild (Cloud Rewind) |
|---|---|---|
| What backup returns | The data — into an environment that's gone | The application: infra + config + data |
| The VPC/IAM/DNS layer | Rebuilt from memory, over days | Recreated from the versioned graph |
| Dependencies | The wiki lies; archaeology begins | Discovered continuously, mapped live |
| Region failure | A slide titled 'DR strategy' | Cross-region rebuild, orchestrated |
| Account compromise | Restore into the blast radius | Clean-account recreation |
| Friday's bad apply | A weekend of unpicking | Environment rewind to 4:49 p.m. |
| DR testing | Too risky, so fictional | Non-disruptive drills, timed |
| IaC relationship | 'The Terraform is the backup' (it isn't) | Intent (IaC) audited by actuality (Rewind) |
Adoption starts with discovery — and the first dependency graph usually justifies the PoC by itself.
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Agentless discovery walks your cloud accounts continuously — resources, configuration and the dependency graph between them, versioned like code.
Resources grouped into applications with their relationships — recovery thinks in apps, the way the business does, not in orphaned resource lists.
Point-in-time states of the whole environment — the VPC layout, the IAM bindings, the LB rules — selectable like backup points.
The application environment reassembled in order — network first, dependencies resolved, data attached — same region, new region or clean account.
Non-disruptive rebuild drills prove the recovery works and time it — cloud DR testing stops being a quarterly fiction.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Cloud Rewind restores the half of recovery every backup forgets — the environment the data calls home.
Accounts walked via APIs continuously — every resource, config and relationship mapped without an agent anywhere.
The LB that fronts the ASG that mounts the volume that talks to the RDS — the graph nobody documented, discovered and versioned.
Resources organised into the applications the business actually names — recovery scoped to 'the payments app', not forty resource IDs.
Point-in-time states of infrastructure AND configuration — the environment as it was before the destructive change, selectable.
Network, compute, IAM, dependencies and data reassembled in dependency order — the app returns, not a pile of restored parts.
The region goes dark; the application rebuilds in another — the region-failure runbook as orchestration instead of heroics.
Account compromised? The application recreates in a clean account — the cloud equivalent of the cleanroom, for when the blast radius is the account itself.
The Terraform apply that deleted the wrong things, the console mistake at 5 p.m. Friday — the environment rewinds to before it happened.
Rebuild rehearsals into isolated environments on schedule — cloud DR testing with timings and evidence, not assumptions.
Drills produce real rebuild timings per application — the number the board wants, observed instead of estimated.
The environment's current state versus its history — drift that betrays trouble, visible before it becomes an incident.
Clumio protects the data; Cloud Rewind rebuilds its home — the cloud estate's full recovery story from one platform.
The official Cloud Rewind demo plus the platform’s cloud-recovery context.
A whole application rebuilt — infrastructure, config and data together.
Where Cloud Rewind sits in the platform's cloud story.
Parallelised recovery engineering at cloud scale.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →Here’s what genuinely sets Cloud Rewind apart from the alternatives.
Your backup returns the database; who returns the VPC, the IAM bindings, the load balancer rules and the DNS? Until this category, the answer was 'the team, from memory, over days'.
Continuous discovery maps what the wiki never did — the actual relationships between resources — and versions it, so the rebuild follows the graph instead of archaeology.
Terraform describes what should exist — if discipline held, if state matches, if nobody clicked the console. Cloud Rewind versions what actually exists, drift and hotfixes included. The two are friends; only one is evidence.
When the account itself is compromised, restoring 'in place' is restoring into the blast radius — new-account rebuild is the cloud cleanroom, and almost nothing else offers it.
Non-disruptive drills rebuild the app in isolation and time it — the cloud DR plan graduates from architecture-diagram fiction to measured, evidenced capability.
The cloud-resilience pioneer's technology with the data layer (Clumio) and the platform (Commvault Cloud) beside it — the whole cloud recovery story, one vendor.
Applications, accounts, regions and the honest state of the environment runbooks — TechBag maps it free against your cloud bill.
Accounts connected, the dependency graph builds itself — the first artifact is a map of what actually exists (expect surprises).
A scoped application rebuilt into isolation, timed — the measured RTO is the PoC's deliverable.
Drills on cadence, drift visible, region/account runbooks executable. TechBag manages the commercials.
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
“A terraform destroy hit the wrong workspace at 4:50 on a Friday. Cloud Rewind rebuilt the environment — VPC, IAM, everything — by 8. The data restore was the easy part; this was the save.”
“Our region-failure drill used to be a slide. Now it's a timed rebuild into another region — 3 hours 40 for the core app, measured, with a report.”
“The discovery graph found dependencies our architecture diagram flatly denied. Recovery planning against reality instead of the wiki is worth the licence alone.”
“Account-compromise tabletop: rebuild into a clean account, repoint DNS, done. The security team's ending finally matches the ops team's capability.”
“We're heavy IaC and still bought it — Terraform describes intent; this captures actuality, drift and all. They audit each other beautifully.”
“Rebuild drills every month now — non-disruptive, evidenced. Our cloud DR posture went from aspiration to observation.”
“Scope note: it rebuilds cloud-native environments — the on-prem estate stays with the main platform. Together they cover us; alone neither would.”
“Post-acquisition, the Commvault console integration keeps deepening — buying the startup's tech with the platform's roadmap was the right call.”
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the cloud rebuild market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
App-complete rebuild across three clouds — the Appranix engine on the Commvault estate. This page's subject.
The grid nobody publishes — how much of the environment comes back vs what it costs to keep ready.
Environment-complete depth at SaaS lightness — the category's defining corner.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Replication DR, the IaC mirage and the data-layer platforms — honest lanes for each.
| Dimension | Cloud Rewind | AWS Elastic DR | Azure Site Recovery | IaC redeploy (DIY) | Rubrik (cloud) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| What it is | App-complete cloud rebuild | AWS replication DR | Azure replication DR | Your pipelines | Data-layer cloud modules |
| Rebuilds config & dependencies | The whole graph | Servers, mostly | VMs, mostly | If disciplined | Data-first |
| Multi-cloud | AWS + Azure + GCP | Into AWS only | Azure-centric | Wherever you code it | Broad |
| Clean-account rebuild | Native | No | No | Possible | Emerging |
| Drills & evidence | Non-disruptive, timed | Drills supported | Test failovers | A project each time | Platform reporting |
| Ops weight | SaaS, agentless | Replication agents | Azure machinery | All yours | SaaS-managed |
| Best fit | Cloud-first apps with stakes | AWS DR from on-prem | Azure VM estates | IaC-mature teams | Rubrik-platform buyers |
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Drag the sliders (count cloud applications; IT-hour cost as loaded engineer rate). Estimates assume ~12 hours per app per year across environment-runbook upkeep, drift archaeology and DR-test theatre, with ~70% absorbed by discovery, drills and rewind — the incident-day value (days of rebuild avoided) is the real number. Illustrative.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Cloud Rewind prices as SaaS by protected applications. TechBag models it — with the Clumio pairing — in one GST quote.
Best for proving the gap
Best for region/account risk
Best for complete cloud recovery
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Ask your backup plan: after the data restores, who rebuilds the VPC, IAM and DNS? Silence is the finding.
Compare the discovered dependency graph against your architecture diagram. Document the differences — those are risks.
PoC success = one application rebuilt into isolation with a stopwatch. Everything else is a demo.
Rehearse the compromised-account scenario: rebuild into a fresh account, repoint, validate.
Diff Rewind's captured state against your Terraform. The drift you find is what IaC-alone recovery would have lost.
If region failure is in your risk register, time the cross-region rebuild now — not during the outage.
Map which apps need Clumio (data) + Rewind (environment) together — the halves recover as one.
Cloud-native scope only — keep the on-prem estate on the main platform and let TechBag stitch the whole story.
Connect a PoC account and get the dependency graph free, or bring your DR diagram and let a TechBag advisor time the rebuild it promises.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.