- BFSIBanking, Financial Services & Insurance
- HealthcareComing soon
- ManufacturingComing soon
- Retail & E-CommerceComing soon
GravityZone PHASR
Secure the front door. Email is where most attacks arrive — GravityZone PHASR is the industry’s FIRST Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (DASR) — self-learning AI builds per-user baselines, then dynamically restricts risky tools to shut down Living-off-the-Land & ransomware before they run. Standalone since Oct 2025; bolts onto ANY EDR.
Buy through TechBag
Same software. Better outcome — at no extra cost.
Free, vendor-neutral, 30 minutes
How it’s rated
Full scoreboard ↓Quick answer
The Bitdefender platform family
This page covers GravityZone PHASR — the industry-first DASR innovation. The rest of the Bitdefender platform:
Quick facts
30-second orientation- Product
- GravityZone PHASR — proactive hardening (DASR)
- Vendor
- Bitdefender (founded 2001 · Bucharest)
- The category
- Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction — industry FIRST
- What it does
- Per-user AI baselines; dynamically restrict risky tools
- The edge
- Dynamic & per-user (not static rules/allowlists)
- Standalone
- Since 15 Oct 2025 — bolts onto ANY 3rd-party EDR
- Proof
- Won the 2025 Gartner Visionary spot; ~95% risky-tool cut
- Stops
- Living-off-the-Land (LOTL/LOLBins), ransomware paths
- Vs
- ThreatLocker, CrowdStrike, MS Defender ASR, Sophos, SentinelOne
- In India via
- TechBag — scoping, licensing, local support, GST
Understand proactive hardening (DASR) before you buy it
Most product pages skip this. We start here — so you buy a capability, not a buzzword.
What is GravityZone PHASR?
Bitdefender’s industry-first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (DASR) — self-learning AI builds per-user & per-app baselines, then dynamically restricts the risky tools attackers need, closing LOTL & ransomware paths before they run.
Static rules & allowlists vs PHASR — the honest table
What consolidation actually replaces, dimension by dimension.
| Dimension | Unprotected / signature email | GravityZone PHASR (Bitdefender) |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Static rules / allowlist (shared) | Dynamic, self-learning (per user) |
| Granularity | One policy for everyone | Per-user & per-application |
| Timing | Detect after execution | Close the path before it runs |
| LOTL / LOLBins | Hard to catch (legit tools) | Tools removed per user |
| Attack surface | Fixed, broad | Shrunk ~95% (atypical risky use) |
| Deployment | Replace your stack | Standalone — bolt onto any EDR |
| Adaptation | Manual rule tuning | AI adapts as behaviour changes |
| Best fit | (varies) | Proactive per-user hardening (any stack) |
Bitdefender GravityZone PHASR is the industry-first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (DASR) — self-learning AI builds per-user & per-app baselines, then dynamically restricts risky tools to shut down Living-off-the-Land & ransomware before they execute (~95% risky-tool cut). Standalone since Oct 2025; bolts onto ANY third-party EPP/EDR/XDR. Won the 2025 Gartner Visionary spot. Honest: DASR is emerging — a proactive complement to your EDR, not a replacement. TechBag scopes it, compares honestly & adds GST.
The five pieces of the platform
Vendors love diagrams; buyers need to know what they’re actually operating. Here’s the whole platform, demystified.
Self-Learning AI Baselines
PHASR uses self-learning AI to build behavioural baselines PER USER and PER APPLICATION — learning what each employee and each app normally does, and which tools and privileges they legitimately need. Learn the normal. Everything anomalous stands out.
Dynamic, Per-User Restriction
Rather than a static rule-set everyone shares, PHASR DYNAMICALLY restricts only the anomalous, risky tools and privileges each specific user doesn’t need — tailored to that person, adjusted as behaviour changes. Right-sized per user. Attackers can’t reuse a technique across the estate.
Shut LOTL & Ransomware Paths
By removing access to the risky native tools (LOLBins) and privileges that Living-off-the-Land attacks and ransomware depend on, PHASR closes those paths BEFORE anything runs — preemptive, not reactive (Bitdefender claims it restricts up to ~95% of atypical risky tool usage). Close the path first. Nothing to detect later.
Standalone or with GravityZone
Available STANDALONE since 15 October 2025, PHASR can run as an ADD-ON companion on top of a THIRD-PARTY EPP/EDR/XDR — including a competitor’s — without replacing your existing stack; or it slots natively into GravityZone. Add hardening to what you already run. No rip-and-replace.
The DASR Innovation
PHASR is the industry’s first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (a new Gartner category) — dynamic, per-user, self-learning hardening rather than static rules or allowlists — and it’s the reason Bitdefender took the 2025 Gartner Visionary spot. Proactive, not reactive. Shrink the surface before the attack.
One agent on every machine, one console over all of them — modules attach without a second operational world.
Twelve capabilities. Learn, harden, reduce.
Bitdefender hardens each user preemptively — dynamic, per-user attack-surface reduction that closes LOTL & ransomware paths before they run — the industry-first DASR innovation of portfolio, and paired with the human firewall.
Per-User Behavioural Baselines
Self-learning AI builds a behavioural baseline for EACH user — what tools, apps and privileges that specific employee legitimately uses — so defences are tailored per person, not one-size-fits-all. Learn each user. Everything else looks anomalous.
Per-Application Baselines
PHASR also learns per APPLICATION — the normal behaviour of each app — so it can tell a legitimate action from a risky, out-of-character one and flag anomalies precisely. Learn each app. Spot the abnormal.
Self-Learning, Adaptive AI
The AI keeps learning — adapting baselines as roles and behaviour change — so hardening stays right-sized over time without constant manual rule-tuning. Learns and adapts. No endless rule maintenance.
Anomaly & Risk Scoring
PHASR continuously scores each action against the learned baseline — surfacing the anomalous, risky tool usage that an attacker would need, precisely and with context. Score the anomaly. Know exactly what to restrict.
Dynamic Hardening (Per User)
Rather than a shared static rule-set, PHASR DYNAMICALLY hardens each user’s environment — restricting only what that person doesn’t need — and adjusts as behaviour changes. Right-sized, per user. Not a blanket policy.
Restrict Risky Tools & Privileges
PHASR removes access to the risky native tools (LOLBins) and elevated privileges a given user doesn’t legitimately need — the very things attackers abuse — without breaking that user’s real work. Take away the weapons. Keep the work.
Stop Living-off-the-Land (LOTL)
By denying the legitimate-but-risky tools that Living-off-the-Land attacks rely on (PowerShell, WMI and other LOLBins where a user doesn’t need them), PHASR shuts those techniques down at the source. Close the LOTL path. Attackers lose their tools.
Block Paths Before Execution
PHASR closes the attack path BEFORE anything executes — preemptive prevention rather than post-breach detection — so ransomware and hands-on-keyboard techniques never get to run. Stop it before it starts. Nothing to clean up.
Shrink the Attack Surface (~95%)
Bitdefender claims PHASR restricts up to ~95% of atypical risky tool usage — dramatically shrinking the estate’s attack surface so there’s far less for an attacker to abuse. Smaller surface. Far fewer paths in.
Per-User Attack Surface Reduction
Because reduction is per user, attackers can’t reuse the same technique across the estate — what works on one employee is closed on another — breaking lateral, one-technique-fits-all attacks. No reusable technique. Every user is different.
Standalone — Bolt onto Any EDR
Available standalone since 15 Oct 2025, PHASR runs as an ADD-ON companion on top of a THIRD-PARTY EPP/EDR/XDR (even a competitor’s) — adding proactive hardening without replacing your stack. Add hardening to what you run. No rip-and-replace.
Native to GravityZone (Optional)
Or run PHASR natively inside GravityZone — same platform, same console as Bitdefender EPP/EDR/XDR — for proactive hardening tightly integrated with your prevention and response. One platform, more protection. Hardening built in.
Watch Bitdefender GravityZone PHASR in action
The overview, getting started, and protecting M365 email.
GravityZone PHASR — Security Tailored to Every User
Proactive per-user hardening, explained.
GravityZone XDR — Explained in 5 Minutes
The platform PHASR builds on.
GravityZone EDR, XDR or MDR? — Which Fits
Where hardening fits the stack.
Want a live, India-context walkthrough on your own fleet?
Book a guided demo →The endpoint catches what arrives. Email stops it arriving.
Here’s what genuinely sets PHASR apart (and the emerging-category caveat).
Industry-first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction — a new category
The single biggest reason organisations look at PHASR is that it defines a NEW category: Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (DASR). It’s the industry’s first — dynamic, per-user, self-learning hardening rather than the static rules and allowlists everyone else offers — and it’s the reason Bitdefender won the 2025 Gartner Visionary spot. The problem it solves: traditional attack-surface reduction is STATIC — a shared rule-set or allowlist applied to everyone — which is blunt (it blocks tools some users legitimately need, or leaves risky tools open because someone somewhere needs them) and easy for attackers to map and work around. And most endpoint security is reactive: detect the attack after it starts. What Bitdefender provides: PHASR uses self-learning AI to build behavioural baselines PER USER and PER APPLICATION, then DYNAMICALLY restricts only the anomalous, risky tools and privileges each specific user doesn’t need — tailored, adaptive, preemptive. It shuts down Living-off-the-Land (LOTL/LOLBins) and ransomware paths BEFORE they execute, and Bitdefender claims it restricts up to ~95% of atypical risky tool usage. Why it matters: this is a genuinely new way to defend — shrink the attack surface proactively and per-user, so attackers can’t reuse one technique across the estate — not just detect and respond after the fact. It’s why Gartner named Bitdefender a Visionary. The value: PHASR is the industry-first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction — dynamic, per-user, self-learning hardening that closes attack paths before they open. For proactive, category-defining defence, this matters. TechBag helps organisations adopt PHASR. TechBag helps you harden per user, before the attack.
Dynamic and per-user — not static rules or allowlists
A defining, technically decisive strength of PHASR is that it’s DYNAMIC and PER-USER — not a static, one-size-fits-all rule-set or allowlist — which is what makes it precise, adaptive and hard for attackers to defeat. The problem it solves: static approaches (ASR rules, application allowlisting) apply the SAME policy to everyone. That’s a compromise: too tight and you break legitimate work for some users; too loose and you leave risky tools open because a few people need them. Static rules also don’t adapt as roles change, and attackers can enumerate and route around a fixed policy. What Bitdefender provides: PHASR learns each user’s and app’s normal behaviour with self-learning AI, then restricts only what THAT user doesn’t legitimately need — right-sized per person, adjusted continuously as behaviour changes. Where a static allowlist (like ThreatLocker) enforces a fixed inventory, PHASR tailors and adapts. Why it matters: per-user, dynamic hardening means fewer broken workflows (you only restrict what each person truly doesn’t need), better coverage (no risky tool left open just because someone somewhere uses it), and resilience (attackers can’t reuse a technique that works on one user against another). It’s hardening that fits reality, not a blunt blanket policy. The value: PHASR is dynamic and per-user — self-learning AI restricts only each user’s unneeded risky tools, adapting over time — not a static rule-set or allowlist. For precise, adaptive hardening, this matters. TechBag helps organisations deploy PHASR. TechBag helps you harden precisely, per user.
Shuts down Living-off-the-Land & ransomware — before they run
A core practical strength of PHASR is WHAT it stops: Living-off-the-Land (LOTL/LOLBins) attacks and ransomware paths — and it stops them BEFORE they execute by removing the tools and privileges those attacks depend on. The problem it solves: modern attackers increasingly avoid malware and instead abuse legitimate, built-in tools (PowerShell, WMI, other LOLBins) and stolen privileges — ‘living off the land’ — which is hard for signature and even behavioural detection to catch, because the tools themselves are legitimate. And detection is reactive: by the time you see it, the attacker is already inside, running. What Bitdefender provides: PHASR removes access to the risky native tools and privileges each user doesn’t legitimately need — so when an attacker (or ransomware) tries to use them, the tools simply aren’t available to that user. The attack path is closed before anything runs; Bitdefender claims up to ~95% of atypical risky tool usage is restricted. Why it matters: closing the path preemptively is fundamentally stronger than detecting the attack after it starts — you deny attackers the very tools LOTL and ransomware depend on, per user, so there’s nothing to detect and clean up later. It complements (doesn’t replace) your EDR’s detection. The value: PHASR shuts down Living-off-the-Land and ransomware paths BEFORE execution by removing the risky tools and privileges attackers abuse — preemptive, per-user. For stopping LOTL, this matters. TechBag helps organisations close those paths. TechBag helps you deny attackers their tools, before they run.
Standalone since Oct 2025 — bolt onto ANY EPP/EDR you already run
A strategically important strength of PHASR is that, since 15 October 2025, it’s available STANDALONE — so it can run as an ADD-ON companion on top of a THIRD-PARTY EPP/EDR/XDR (including a competitor’s), adding proactive hardening WITHOUT replacing your existing stack. The problem it solves: most organisations already have an endpoint stack (CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, Microsoft Defender, whatever) they’ve invested in and don’t want to rip out — which normally means a category-defining innovation is out of reach unless you switch vendors. Great new capability shouldn’t require a full replacement. What Bitdefender provides: PHASR runs standalone as a companion layer — you keep your current EPP/EDR/XDR for prevention, detection and response, and add PHASR’s dynamic per-user hardening on top. Or, if you’re on Bitdefender, it slots natively into GravityZone. Either way, you get the DASR innovation without a migration. Why it matters: bolting onto ANY existing stack means you can adopt the industry-first hardening layer regardless of what EDR you run today — no rip-and-replace, no vendor lock-in to get it, low-friction proof of value. For organisations that like their current EDR but want proactive hardening it doesn’t offer, this is the whole point. The value: PHASR is available standalone (since Oct 2025) and bolts onto ANY third-party EPP/EDR/XDR — adding proactive per-user hardening without replacing your stack. For adding hardening without a migration, this matters. TechBag helps organisations layer PHASR on. TechBag helps you add hardening to the stack you already run.
A proven European champion’s bet — and TechBag adds local India support
PHASR comes from Bitdefender (founded 2001, Bucharest) — a rare, proven, independent European/Romanian global security champion — and represents its bet on the next frontier of endpoint security; for Indian organisations TechBag adds the scoping, licensing and INR/GST support that make adopting it straightforward. Bitdefender the company: founded in 2001 and still led by founder Florin Talpes, Bitdefender is one of the few globally-significant security vendors that isn’t US- or Israel-based — a genuine European champion, private and independent, protecting 500M+ systems worldwide, whose detection engine is respected enough that other vendors license it (OEM). It is the ONLY vendor named a Visionary in the Gartner EPP Magic Quadrant (three years running) — and PHASR is precisely why. PHASR the bet: Bitdefender’s conviction is that the next frontier is shrinking the attack surface BEFORE an attack, per user, dynamically — not just detecting it after. That’s a genuinely forward, category-creating move (DASR). India relevance: PHASR’s ability to bolt onto ANY existing EDR suits India’s mixed, cost-conscious estates — you add hardening without replacing what you have; and Bitdefender is well-established in India (distributed via BD Software Distribution, Navi Mumbai). Where TechBag adds value: Bitdefender lists in USD globally — so TechBag adds the local layer: scoping PHASR (standalone or with GravityZone), honest positioning vs ThreatLocker/CrowdStrike/Defender ASR, INR/GST invoicing, onboarding and local support. The value: PHASR is a proven European champion’s category-defining bet — and TechBag adds scoping, honest comparison, INR/GST and support. TechBag supplies it with local support. TechBag provides Bitdefender PHASR, made local for India.
The honest scope
GravityZone PHASR is Bitdefender’s category-defining innovation — the industry’s first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (DASR): self-learning AI builds per-user and per-application behavioural baselines, then dynamically restricts the anomalous, risky tools and privileges attackers need, shutting down Living-off-the-Land and ransomware paths before they execute. Available standalone (since 15 October 2025) to bolt onto ANY third-party EPP/EDR/XDR, or native to GravityZone. From Bitdefender (founded 2001, Bucharest; Gartner’s only EPP Visionary — largely because of PHASR). The honest framing — strengths, and the emerging-category caveat: PHASR’s strengths are that it’s DYNAMIC and per-user (not static rules or allowlists), self-learning, first-mover in a brand-new category, and able to bolt onto any existing EDR without rip-and-replace. The candid truth about the category: DASR is EMERGING — there is no clean 1:1 rival yet, and the whole approach is new enough that it’s a complement to (not a replacement for) your EPP/EDR/XDR. Where others sit: ThreatLocker is the closest philosophically — strong application allowlisting and hardening — but it’s STATIC allowlisting, not dynamic behavioural, and needs careful curation; CrowdStrike Falcon Exposure/ASR features and Microsoft Defender ASR rules are also static, rule-based reductions bundled with those platforms; Sophos and SentinelOne have some hardening/ASR elements. None are dynamic, per-user, self-learning the way PHASR is — that’s the first-mover edge — but if you want a mature, well-understood static allowlist today, ThreatLocker is a real option, and if you’re standardised on CrowdStrike or Defender, their built-in ASR may suffice for basic reduction. So the honest positioning: for dynamic, per-user, proactive hardening that closes attack paths before they open — and can bolt onto whatever EDR you already run — PHASR is genuinely first-of-its-kind and category-defining; for mature static allowlisting, ThreatLocker; for basic ASR already in your platform, CrowdStrike/Defender. TechBag scopes PHASR honestly — standalone or with GravityZone, positioned against ThreatLocker/CrowdStrike/Defender, and licensed and supported locally with GST.
The numbers behind the platform
What your PHASR journey looks like
Scoping (& the stack)
Your existing EPP/EDR/XDR, estate and goals — and whether PHASR runs standalone (bolted onto your current stack) or native in GravityZone. TechBag scopes it and positions it vs ThreatLocker/CrowdStrike/Defender ASR.
Learn the baselines
Deploy PHASR and let the self-learning AI build per-user and per-application behavioural baselines — learning what each employee and app legitimately needs, with low friction. Learning the normal.
Harden dynamically
PHASR dynamically restricts the anomalous, risky tools and privileges each user doesn’t need — closing Living-off-the-Land and ransomware paths before they execute, per person. Surface shrinks, per user.
Adapt & manage
The AI keeps adapting baselines as behaviour changes; combine with GravityZone EDR/XDR or your existing stack. TechBag supports you locally (GST).
Trusted across regulated industries in 100+ countries
The review scoreboard
Modelled on Gartner Peer Insights structure. *Counts and breakdowns are illustrative pending verified review collection.
Quick poll — what’s driving your evaluation?
Talk to an advisor“PHASR closed the Living-off-the-Land paths our EDR could only detect AFTER they ran. It removed the risky tools each user didn’t need — per person — so there was simply nothing for the attacker to abuse.”
“The per-user, dynamic model is the point — no blanket allowlist that breaks half our workflows. It learned what each employee actually does and only restricted the rest.”
“We kept our existing EDR and just bolted PHASR on top as a standalone add-on. No rip-and-replace, and we got proactive hardening our current stack didn’t offer.”
“Honest: we looked at ThreatLocker too. For a mature static allowlist it’s solid, but we wanted DYNAMIC, self-learning, per-user — which is where PHASR is genuinely first-of-its-kind. TechBag laid out the difference clearly.”
“Ransomware needs certain tools and privileges to move. PHASR took those away from the users who didn’t need them — before anything ran. Preemptive, not reactive.”
“It’s an emerging category, so we treated PHASR as a complement to our EDR, not a replacement — and that’s exactly how TechBag scoped it. Added a hardening layer we didn’t have.”
“The claim of restricting ~95% of atypical risky tool usage sounded bold — but in our estate the attack surface genuinely shrank, per user. Attackers can’t reuse one technique everywhere anymore.”
“Bitdefender lists in USD — TechBag scoped PHASR (standalone, on top of our existing EDR), positioned it vs ThreatLocker and Defender ASR, and added INR/GST and local support.”
Where everyone sits — the grids
Analyst firms bury this view behind paywalls, and G2 retired its Grid. So here’s TechBag’s synthesis of the Hardening / ASR market — tap any vendor to see why it sits where it does.
TechBag Email-Security Grid
Execution strength vs product vision — the classic market map, minus the paywall.
Industry-first dynamic, per-user DASR. This page's product.
Detection × Portfolio Integration
The grid nobody publishes — how strong the email detection is vs how integrated with the wider security portfolio.
Dynamic, per-user, self-learning depth.
Positions are TechBag’s illustrative synthesis of public review-platform data and vendor documentation — not a reproduction of any analyst graphic. Verify before relying on it.
Bitdefender PHASR vs the hardening / ASR field
ThreatLocker, CrowdStrike, Microsoft Defender ASR, Sophos and SentinelOne — honest lanes; DASR is emerging, so PHASR is a proactive complement, not a replacement. The edge is DYNAMIC, per-user, self-learning hardening that bolts onto any stack. Mature static allowlisting? ThreatLocker. We say so.
| Dimension | Bitdefender PHASR | ThreatLocker | CrowdStrike (Exposure/ASR) | MS Defender ASR | Sophos | SentinelOne |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Position | Industry-first Dynamic ASR (DASR) | Application allowlisting / hardening | Exposure/ASR features in Falcon | ASR rules in Defender | Some hardening / device control | Some ASR / policy hardening |
| Dynamic vs static | DYNAMIC, self-learning | Static allowlist (curated) | Static rule-based | Static ASR rules | Mostly static | Mostly static |
| Per-user / per-app tailoring | Per-user AND per-application | Per-policy (groups) | Shared rules | Shared rules | Shared policy | Shared policy |
| Stops LOTL / LOLBins preemptively | Removes risky tools before execution | Blocks unlisted (allowlist) | Detects / some ASR | ASR rules cover some | Some | Detects |
| Bolts onto 3rd-party EPP/EDR/XDR | Yes — standalone add-on (Oct 2025) | Yes (independent layer) | Falcon-only | Defender-only | Sophos-only | S1-only |
| Maturity of the approach | Emerging (first-mover DASR) | Mature allowlisting | Mature platform | Mature (MS-scale) | Mature | Mature |
| Recognition | Won 2025 Gartner Visionary (PHASR) | Strong niche reputation | Leader (EPP MQ) | Leader (EPP MQ) | Solid | Leader (EPP MQ) |
| Best fit | Dynamic per-user hardening on any stack (DASR) | Mature static application allowlisting | ASR bundled if you’re on Falcon | ASR rules if you’re on Defender | SMB hardening within Sophos | ASR within SentinelOne |
Which email-security approach fits you?
Honest fit signals — because the fastest way to lose your trust is to pretend one product wins every scenario.
Choose Bitdefender PHASR if…
- ✓You want DYNAMIC, per-user, self-learning hardening — not a static rule-set or allowlist everyone shares
- ✓You want to close Living-off-the-Land and ransomware paths BEFORE they execute (proactive, not reactive)
- ✓You want to add proactive hardening on top of ANY existing EPP/EDR/XDR — standalone, no rip-and-replace
- ✓You want the industry-first DASR innovation (the 2025 Gartner Visionary reason) — with TechBag scoping and GST
ThreatLocker if…
- ✓You want mature, well-understood STATIC application allowlisting and are prepared to curate it
CrowdStrike (Exposure/ASR) if…
- ✓You’re standardised on Falcon and its built-in ASR/exposure features suffice (TechBag sells CrowdStrike too)
Microsoft Defender ASR if…
- ✓You’re on Defender and its static ASR rules cover your basic reduction — TechBag has a Microsoft hub
Sophos / SentinelOne if…
- ✓You want the hardening/ASR elements built into those platforms — TechBag can compare honestly
What do email threats cost you?
Drag the sliders (endpoints; incidents per year; hour cost as loaded rate). Estimates contrast a reactive, detect-after-the-fact stack vs adding PHASR (dynamic per-user hardening that closes Living-off-the-Land and ransomware paths before they run) — the wins are a smaller attack surface, fewer incidents that ever start, and less to detect and clean up. Illustrative — TechBag scopes PHASR (standalone or with GravityZone) on your stack.
Loaded cost = salary + overheads per productive hour. Illustrative only — your TechBag quote models actual device counts and modules.
Three ways to consume it
Bitdefender GravityZone PHASR is licensed PER ENDPOINT / per user as a proactive-hardening add-on — available STANDALONE (since 15 Oct 2025) to bolt onto any third-party EPP/EDR/XDR, or bundled/native within GravityZone. Pricing is typically by quote and scales with seat count and whether it’s standalone or with the wider GravityZone platform. Bitdefender lists in USD; TechBag scopes it (standalone or with GravityZone) and handles INR/GST.
PHASR (per endpoint / user)
Best for proactive per-user hardening
- Industry-first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction (DASR) — dynamic, per-user, self-learning
- Standalone (Oct 2025) — bolts onto ANY third-party EPP/EDR/XDR, or native in GravityZone
- Shuts down Living-off-the-Land & ransomware paths before they execute (~95% risky-tool cut)
+ Platform add-ons
Best for a broader rollout
- Scoped to your estate
- Add-on modules as needed
- Phased, right-sized deployment
+ scoping & local support
Best value with TechBag
- Scoping (standalone or with GravityZone) + honest ThreatLocker/CrowdStrike/Defender-ASR positioning
- Bitdefender lists USD; India via BD Software (Navi Mumbai)
- TechBag adds INR/GST invoicing, onboarding & local support
Buy it for less — TechBag pricing beats list
Whatever the list prices above, TechBag negotiates a significantly better deal — with GST-compliant INR invoicing and local support. Ask us for your discounted quote.
Get an India-ready quote
Tell us your device counts and current tools — we’ll model it against what you spend today.
The 8 questions to ask every vendor
Take this into your next vendor call — including ours.
Want DYNAMIC, self-learning hardening — not a static rule-set or allowlist everyone shares? That’s PHASR’s core.
Want defences tailored PER USER and per application, so attackers can’t reuse one technique across the estate?
Worried about Living-off-the-Land (LOLBins) and ransomware? PHASR removes the risky tools before they run.
Keeping your existing EDR? PHASR is standalone (since Oct 2025) — add it on top of ANY EPP/EDR/XDR, no rip-and-replace.
Want to shrink the attack surface preemptively? Bitdefender claims PHASR restricts up to ~95% of atypical risky tool usage.
Understand it’s emerging (DASR, industry-first)? Treat PHASR as a proactive complement to your EDR, not a replacement.
Comparing static allowlisting? ThreatLocker is mature but STATIC; PHASR is dynamic & per-user — TechBag compares honestly.
Bitdefender lists in USD — TechBag scopes PHASR (standalone or with GravityZone), adds INR/GST invoicing and local support.
Questions buyers ask
Ready to harden every user before the attack?
Scope Bitdefender GravityZone PHASR (the industry-first Dynamic Attack Surface Reduction — self-learning AI that dynamically restricts each user’s risky tools to close Living-off-the-Land and ransomware paths before they run, standalone on any EDR or native in GravityZone) — and let a TechBag advisor scope it, position it vs ThreatLocker/CrowdStrike/Defender ASR, and add INR/GST invoicing and local support.
Stats, ratings, review counts and pricing are illustrative and sourced from public materials; verify before purchase.